|
1
|
|
|
2
|
- Goal: To eliminate childhood
lead poisoning as a public health problem in the US by 2010
|
|
3
|
- Primary Goals:
- Determine prevalence
- Evaluate screening
- Evaluate elmination progress
- Capture other child health data
- Secondary Goals:
- Identify children missed by routine screening
- Develop partnerships
- Increase awareness
|
|
4
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
7
|
- Cluster survey design
- Population proportional to estimated size sampling
- Random selection of clusters & starting address (source: 2000 Census
& Chicago Building Footprint GIS Data)
- Sample size calcs. based on HHs, prevalence
- 80% power, 5% margin of error, 20% intra-class correlation
- Visitation rules
|
|
8
|
|
|
9
|
- Eligibility
- Children aged 1-5 years, live at address at least 30 hours per week,
parent/guardian provides informed consent, did not matter about
previous blood lead testing status
- Incentives
- To improve participation rates
|
|
10
|
- Notate outcome in door to
door log
- Informed Consent
- Draw Venous Blood
- Child questionnaire for each
child
- Household questionnaire for
each home
- Immunization records documentation
- Incentive provided ($15 grocery coupon)
|
|
11
|
- Most intensive efforts on Saturdays and Sundays for 2 or 3 weekends
- 15 teams of 2 or 3 – community based worker, PHA (Interviewer), and
phlebotomist
- Follow-up visits during the week (2 or 3 teams)
- HHs with 1 child = 15 minutes
|
|
12
|
- Vacant = 9.7%
- Refused=5.4%
- Not Eligible=60.0%
- Other=9.4%
- Enrolled=15.5%
|
|
13
|
|
|
14
|
- All survey and BLL data is data-entered in Access DB
- Result letters sent 1-2 months later
- CDPH is follows-up with children with BLLs > 10 mg/dL
- Report findings to communities
|
|
15
|
- HITS is a prevalence study – not intended to be substitute for regular
blood lead screening programs
- Maintaining scientific rigor difficult when faced with realities of
field work
- Finding the correct time of year (spring is better than fall, summer is
unpleasant)
- Time and resource intensive
- Refusals can be problematic, especially in some communities
|
|
16
|
- Identification of new children
- Media exposure
- Better direction of resources
- Leverage for funding
- Coincides with CDPH’s mission
- Model that can be adapted
|
|
17
|
- CDPH (Chicago Department of Public Health)
- Westside Health Authority (Community Agency)
- Lawndale Christian Health Center
- CDC (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention)
- EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency)
- IDPH (Illinois Department of Public Health)
- CMS (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services)
- HUD (U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development)
- WIC (Special Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children)
|
|
18
|
- I’ll be happy to take any questions!
- (Also feel free to call or e-mail with questions or comments: MacRoy_Patrick@cdph.org
- 312-746-5007)
|